They Are Lying To You Movie Review – RoboCop (Remake)



It sucked. It sucked balls.

It sucked hairy, sweaty homeless person balls.

Want to see one that doesn’t suck? Watch the original and forget you ever contemplated watching the remake.

Whats worse is i knew it would suck. Shame on Jose Padilha, MGM and Columbia Pictures for taking a hot, steamy shit on one of my favorite childhood movies just to turn a buck.



Weird Fact Of The Day 06/30/2014

From its original Japanese title, the Nintendo classic “Super Mario Bros.” actually translates to “Italian Plumbers Take LSD Purple Monkey Dishwasher.” However, due to the Reagan Administration’s stringent anti-anthropomorphism policies, the title was changed.

How To Curse Someone In 4 Easy Steps

From my friends at The Weekly World News

A controversial new book tells you how to put curses on your enemies by harnessing your dark powers in four easy steps!

All you have to do, says famed sorcerer and occult author Damien Mulkrin, is forget about the Golden Rule and resign yourself to the fact that vengeance, and plenty of it, is the only thing that will make you happy.

At that point, you can follow Mulkrin’s simple 4-point plan for unleashing the evil powers that will give you the upper hand in your battle with any enemy, no matter how strong he might be, Mulkrin declares.

“Sorcerers, witches and warlocks aren’t the only people who can cast spells and put curses on people. With a little training, anyone can do it – even you,” said Mulkrin, whose frightening new book, When Bad Things Happen to Bad People, is slated for a winter release.

“In fact, my 4-point plan is simple enough for a child to follow.

“I guarantee you won’t find an easier or more effective way to deal with people who give you a hard time.”

Here is Mulkrin’s 4-point plan. WARNING: Dabbling in the occult can be dangerous or even deadly. Proceed at your own risk. Weekly World News does not take responsibility for any results.

1. Rise from your bed at midnight. Sit cross-legged on the floor in a dark, empty room and whisper the words: “Evil, live, live, evil” over and over for one minute. In your mind’s eye, picture the person you want to curse.

2. As the image of the person appears to you, visualize great harm coming to him or her. For example, you might watch with delight as a car runs over him or he falls down a flight of stairs.

3. Savor the victim’s agony – but don’t forget: the misfortune you visualize is the misfortune your victim will suffer in real life.

If you visualize the victim losing an eye, the victim should lose an eye. If you visualize death, the victim should die. Carefully consider the consequences of your actions before you proceed.

4. As you continue to revel in the imaginary evil you have brought to your enemy, whisper: “Powers of darkness, make this so.” Contemplate your actions for a minute or so and then, says Mulkrin, “your work is done.”

“If you are sincere in your desire to punish an enemy, and have absolutely no reservations about bringing him harm, the curse will work,” he said.

Mulkrin isn’t exactly a household name but paranormal experts and occultists are all too familiar with the sorcerer and his work.

In those circles, he is regarded as evil incarnate – a man who has been accused of everything from cannibalism to human sacrifice. But even Mulkrin’s worst critics admit that the sorcerer has a penetrating intelligence and vast knowledge of the black arts.

He also has a knack for simplifying ancient rituals, making them accessible to laymen who have no working knowledge of the occult.

“In ancient times sorcerers relied on elaborate rituals to punish their enemies, but in this day and age, with people having so many demands on their time, these rituals are obsolete,” explained Mulkrin.

“By distilling the process, I have sped things up. If you are of average intelligence, and put your mind to it, there is no reason you can’t put a curse on someone in five minutes or less.”

Marilyn Monroe – Suicide Or Political Assassination?

This is a hard subject for many. She was both loved and hated, admired and abhorred. Whatever you felt about her, there are some damn troubling questions surrounding her demise, and we should always make up our own minds based on evidence, instead of letting others decide for us.



This is the official cause of death and probably the most widely believed. She had tried it four times previously and she clearly had significant mood swings.

The problem with this theory is that too many forensic facts are at odds with it, unless one can imagine Marilyn making up a barbiturate enema and administering it to herself. Quite a number of forensic experts have discarded the suicide theory as inconsistent with the facts.

Another problem with the suicide theory is that she was in good spirits at the time of her death and had been making plans for future events and movies, and if Spoto is correct, her remarriage to Joe DiMaggio.


If, in fact, Marilyn died from a rectally-administered barbiturate enema, the question is who prepared and administered it. It is not out of the realm of possibility that the overdose was accidental.

Spoto makes a very persuasive case for accidental death. Dr. Greenson had been working with Dr. Hyman Engelberg to wean Marilyn off Nembutal, substituting instead chloral hydrate to help her sleep. Milton Rudin claimed that Greenson said something very important the night of Marilyn’s death: ” God damn it! Hy gave her a prescription I didn’t know about!”

Dr. Engelberg was having serious marital problems and obviously didn’t communicate well with Greenson on Marilyn’s prescriptions. Spoto suggests that Greenson would not have given Marilyn a heavy dose of chloral hydrate the evening of her death if he had realized that Marilyn had been taking Nembutal capsules throughout the day. Spoto further suggests that after an exhausting full day with Marilyn that he arranged for Marilyn to have a chloral hydrate enema so that she would sleep through the night.

Chloral hydrate significantly slows down the metabolism of Nembutal, but Greenson did not know that she had been taking Nembutal and Marilyn did not realize that Nembutal and chloral hydrate interacted adversely or she probably would have admitted to Greenson that she had taken Nembutals.

If Spoto’s theory is correct, then who administered the enema? Spoto believes that it had to be Eunice Murray, who, like Greenson, had no inkling that the sedative enema would be fatal.

Any doctor might be loath to admit to himself or others that he had made such a significant mistake in such a high-profile patient, especially since Marilyn appeared drugged during the afternoon. Also, if Eunice was the person who administered the enema, it would be natural for her to try to protect herself and Dr. Greenson by pretending that no such procedure was given to Marilyn.


Marilyn Monroe grave marker

Everyone loves a conspiracy. It is so much more exciting than accidental death or suicide. The celebrity status of the main characters in this drama lends itself heavily towards the romance of conspiracy. Look at the cottage industry that John F. Kennedy’s assassination has generated.

It’s important to distinguish the cover-up of embarrassing information by powerful people from the commitment of a crime to eliminate people who can potentially create embarrassment.

There are a number of credible people who claim that Marilyn Monroe had affairs with one or both Kennedy brothers. John Kennedy, at least, was known to indulge himself in extramarital adventures. So, it is not at all implausible that President Kennedy availed himself of the charms of one of the sexiest and most attractive women of that era. That Robert Kennedy was so inclined is not nearly as clear.

According to Peter Lawford, Marilyn’s unrealistic notions about becoming First Lady caused her to embarrass herself with both Kennedy brothers. Her letters and telephone calls to them had become both tiresome and very risky. It was one thing to cavort with anonymous girls, but quite another to be involved with a celebrity sex symbol like Marilyn Monroe. There was every good reason for JFK and RFK to break off the relationship with Marilyn permanently.

What allegedly became so troublesome was Marilyn’s supposed rage at JFK’s rejection of her and the fear that she was able to strike in both brothers. Donald Wolfe sums it up: “Marilyn Monroe was in a position to bring down the presidency. She was cognizant of Jack Kennedy’s marital infidelities and other private matters. She had his notes and letters and was privy to Kennedy’s involvement with Sam Giancana. That the Kennedy brothers had discussed national security matters with the film star added to an astonishing array of indiscretions.”

It is not out of the realm of possibility that Robert Kennedy was the man appointed by his brother to deliver the rejection to Marilyn personally. It’s not the kind of thing that one writes in a letter and it’s unlikely that JFK was anxious to deliver the message himself.

Did Robert Kennedy bring Marilyn the news of his brother’s desire to break off his relationship on the night Marilyn died? After all, there are some witnesses, including a cop, who place Robert Kennedy near the scene that night. This information may never be known with any certainty, but if Robert Kennedy did somehow make an unannounced visit to Marilyn Monroe on the night of August 4, then it provides unexpected motivation for the suicide theory. That is, while Marilyn may have been in good spirits that day and evening, a visit by Robert Kennedy shattering her notions about an enduring relationship with JFK could have abruptly changed her mood.

Was there an attempt on the part of the government to cover up John Kennedy’s indiscretions with Marilyn Monroe? It would be very surprising indeed if there were not such an attempt.

The alleged cover-up was believed to have extended beyond the phone records and police evidence found at the scene. Shortly after his phone call to the Naars before 11 p.m. on the night of Marilyn’s death, it is believed that Peter Lawford and Pat Newcomb went to Marilyn’s house. Purportedly in a state of panic, Lawford called brother-in-law Bobby Kennedy and explained what had occurred.

However, destroying phone records and personal journals and scraps of paper are not in the same league with murder.

To suggest, as some authors, have that Robert Kennedy was somehow complicit in the murder of Marilyn Monroe is to be ignorant of the character and integrity of the Attorney General. While mystery surrounds the death of Marilyn Monroe, mystery does not shroud the character of Robert Kennedy. Robert Kennedy had a very fixed moral compass which was repeatedly documented in his crusade against organized crime.

Was Marilyn murdered by the Mafia, eager to avenge itself on the Kennedys for Robert’s strike against them and expose the Kennedys’ philandering to the American public? The motive was probably there but with what is known about the individuals present in Marilyn’s home on the night of August 4, 1962, it makes a mob hit with a rectal enema seem a bit unlikely and almost absurd.

The actual events that surrounded Marilyn’s death will probably never be known. What was known for certain was that a living legend mysteriously died before her time, in a mist of confusion, scandal and uncertainty.

Following the autopsy, Marilyn’s body was released to her family. Marilyn’s mother, who was institutionalized, did not take custody of the body. Instead, Joe DiMaggio claimed her remains and arranged a small and quiet funeral for the woman he continued to love up until her death. Finally on August 8, 1962, she was laid to rest in Los Angeles’ Westwood Memorial Park in the Corridor of Memories. On that day, thousands lined the streets and grieved for their icon and the world’s movie legend, Marilyn Monroe.

To The Politically Correct Lemmings – Get Your Greasy Hands Off The English Language

From The Merriem-Webster Dictionary



having an excess of body fat Synonyms blubbery, chubby, corpulent, fleshy, full, gross, lardy, obese, overweight, plump, podgy [chiefly British], portly, pudgy, replete, roly-poly, rotund, round, tubby

Related Words beefy, bulky, chunky, heavy, heavyset, plumpish, stocky, stout, thick, thickset, weighty; brawny, burly, hefty, husky; dumpy, squat, stubby; hippy, paunchy, potbellied; flabby, soft; ample, buxom, corn-fed, ripe, zaftig (also zoftig); endomorphic

Near Antonyms angular, bony (also boney), gaunt, lank, lanky, rawboned, sinewy; cadaverous, emaciated, haggard, pinched, skeletal, wasted; puny, scraggy, scrawny, slight; rangy, reedy, spindling, spindly, stringy, svelte, sylphlike, twiggy, waspish, weedy, willowy; ectomorphic; anorexic

Antonyms lean, skinny, slender, slim, spare, thin


containing or seeming to contain the greatest quantity or number possible Synonyms brimful, brimming, bursting, chockablock, chock-full (or chockful), crammed, crowded, fat, filled, jammed, jam-packed, loaded, packed, stuffed

Related Words overcrowded, overfilled, overflowing, overfull, overladen, overloaded, overstuffed; abounding, flush, fraught, replete, rife, swarming, teeming

Near Antonyms deficient, inadequate, incomplete, insufficient, short, shortish, shy, wanting; depleted, drained, exhausted

Antonyms bare, blank, devoid, empty, stark, vacant, void


having a greater than usual measure across
Synonyms broad, fat, thick

Related Words expansive, extensive, sweeping; commodious, roomy, spacious; outsize (also outsized), oversize (or oversized), sizable (or sizeable), substantial, tidy, voluminous

Near Antonyms fine, hairlike, reedlike; elongate (or elongated), needlelike; bottleneck, close, compressed, condensed, constricted, contracted, squeezed, tight, tightened; attenuate, attenuated; small, smallish, undersized (also undersize)

Antonyms hairline, narrow, paper-thin, skinny, slender, slim, slim-jim, thin


having or being of relatively great depth or extent from one surface to its opposite Synonyms chunky, fat

Related Words blockish, blocky, bulky, dense, hefty, thickish; broad, deep, wide

Near Antonyms narrow, shallow

Antonyms skinny, slender, slim, thin


producing abundantly Synonyms cornucopian, fat, fecund, fructuous, fruitful, lush, luxuriant, productive, prolific, rich

Related Words bearing, generative, producing, yielding; abounding, abundant, bountiful; copious, generous, liberal, plenteous, plentiful, plentitudinous; blooming, bursting, flourishing, swarming, teeming, thriving; creative, inventive, original

Near Antonyms meager (or meagre), scant, scanty, skimp, skimpy, spare, sparse

Antonyms barren, dead, infertile, sterile, unfertile, unfruitful, unproductive


yielding a profit Synonyms economic, fat, gainful, juicy, lucrative, moneymaking, money-spinning [chiefly British], paying, remunerative

Related Words advantageous, beneficial, favorable, rewarding, useful, worthwhile; bankable

Near Antonyms disadvantageous, unfavorable

Antonyms unprofitable


having goods, property, or money in abundance
Synonyms affluent, deep-pocketed, fat, fat-cat, flush, loaded, moneyed (also monied), opulent, silk-stocking, wealthy, well-endowed, well-fixed, well-heeled, well-off, well-to-do

Related Words better-off, comfortable, propertied, prosperous, substantial, successful; flourishing, prospering, thriving; advantaged, blessed (also blest), privileged

Near Antonyms unaffluent; deprived, disadvantaged, hand-to-mouth, underprivileged; bankrupt, bankrupted, beggared, broke, indebted, insolvent, pauperized, ruined, skint [chiefly British]; depressed, pinched, reduced, straitened; low, short

Antonyms destitute, impecunious, impoverished, indigent, needy, penniless, penurious, poor, poverty-stricken


I do not care if those among you are offended by this word. Its a description, not an explentive. Get over yourself. You do not get to excise words from my language just because you suddenly find them offensive.

Same goes for obese, fruity, dumbass, lunatic, retarded, effeminate and insane.


The Project For A New American Century, Mohammad Atta & 9/11

Another wonderfully articulated essay, emailed to me from an unamed source.

Years after the attacks of Sept 11, America still stands, yet divided among many. Divided in times when lies become truth and truth becomes myth. Many accept the official theories of Sept 11th as fact despite the bizarre discrepancies and outright lies and omissions. But today, I’m not here to deal in theories, lies, or myths; I’m here to deal in Conspiracy Fact. Many will hold heartedly deny these facts after reading but will in the end assure that this nation is toppled from the inside out with they’re willful ignorance. Now, I guess the only thing left to ask is “if your government betrayed you, would you know it or more so would you want to know it?”It all begins with a man named “Muhammad Atta”, the politically proclaimed 911 ringleader. We all know who he is; he is supposedly the man who performed a kamikaze style attack with a Boeing 747 into World Trade Center tower 1; bypassing air port security while posing as a normal passenger, boarding a plane and taking control of it with his box cutter, on the same morning NORAD was having war game drills at the directive of PNAC member Vice President Dick Cheney, all while acting alone. Was 911 solely the act of Middle Eastern religious fanatics who acted alone, unassisted by any foreign or domestic agency accomplishing all but one of they’re objectives without hindrance?Well on the surface with media propaganda, one may be inclined to believe so, but when you review the unspoken truths, 911 is shown to be a pre planned attack on the American people, all to accomplish an agenda. As much as you are compelled by media to believe 9/11 was solely the work of Middle Eastern terrorist acting alone, it has more roots to our own government. Let’s begin to examine a Conspiracy Fact; which could be considered by many as…a smoking gun. General Mahmoud Ahmed, the Head of the Pakistani Intelligence Agency, the ISI, wired 100,000 dollars to the lead highjacker Mohammad Atta, reported by some sources as Sept 10. Coincidentally, General Ahmed had this money wired to Atta by “Omar Sheikh”, a British-born Islamic militant who is currently awaiting execution in Pakistan for the murder of American Journalist Daniel Pearl, who the U.S government and his wife both acknowledge was not responsible for the murder.That doesn’t even touch the surface of what’s really going on. On Sept 11th, 2001 this same ISI Head General who wired Atta this money, was in Washington having a series of top level meetings with the White House, the Pentagon, the National Security Council, George Tenant at the time Head of the CIA, and Marc Grossman the under secretary of state of political affairs. And right after 911, this General was escorted out the country with the red carpet, unknown and unheard of. The U.S government has allowed then and continues to allow now the money man behind 9/11 to escape unskaved and untouched; only to have him return to Pakistan and then at the request of the Pakistani President, resigned his position. So here we have the financer of the 9/11 attacks on the morning of Sept 11th having breakfast meetings with top government officials, and then allowed to escape. That’s not shocking these days that they would allow a 911 criminal to escape, when the white house itself is ran by a band of criminals, who have themselves highjacked this country and would sell it out just to maintain political power.The American people can only wonder in awe of what would become of this nation if they were to find out this administration could have prevented 911 and didn’t, or even caused it to happen.

That seems to be exactly the case when we delve deeper into the facts. During the 1980’s with CIA funding, the ISI was developed. It’s basically a parallel of the CIA; a subsidiary, a state within a state, with staff and informers estimated by some at 150,000. It holds unspoken power over all forms of government. With the Head of the ISI General Ahmed wiring Muhammad Atta 100,000 dollars, this fact proves that parts of the ISI directly supported and financed Al-Qaida, and it has long been established by any novice historian that the ISI has acted as go-between in intelligence operations on behalf of the CIA. So with that being said, is it not the CIA who had prior knowledge of the 911 attacks and allowed it to happen at the ISI’s expense?Daniel Ellsberg, the former US defense department whistleblower who has accompanied Sibel Edmonds (Fbi translator whistleblower) in court, has went on the record and stated “It seems to me quite plausible that Pakistan was quite involved in this … To say Pakistan is, to me, to say CIA because … it’s hard to say that the ISI knew something that the CIA had no knowledge of.” It’s a well known fact that for years the CIA used the ISI as a subsidiary to put billions of dollars into Islamic militant groups in Afghanistan, both before and after the Soviet invasion of 1979. The evidence supporting U.S involvement in the attacks of Sept 11th is so profound that they can no longer claim incompetence, but instead criminal intent.It is indeed criminal intent, fore if 9/11 never occurred; the U.S wouldn’t be able to accomplish its geo-political agendas in this century. Yes, those very agendas outlined in the Project for New American Century would be impossible to implement had 9/11 never happened. Tony Blair couldn’t agree more with this statement in saying “To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got the public consent to have suddenly launched a campaign on Afghanistan but for what happened on September 11.” (Tony Blair Speaking To House of Commons Liaison Committee “Britain backs US plan for attack on Iraq” London Times 17 July, 2002.) So basically, the U.S and UK, used 9/11 to its advantage, all of which coincidentally allowed them to pursue plans within the PNAC documents. That only leads one to ask, would those elaborate plans and objectives be written up and not be carried out some how or some way? 9/11 was simply the answer to the PNAC’s problem; in that “the process of transformation is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event—like a new Pearl Harbor.”In essence, PNAC is a blueprint for the creation of a global Pax America and was drawn up for Dick Cheney (now vice-president), Donald Rumsfeld (defense secretary), Paul Wolfowitz (Rumsfeld’s deputy), Jeb Bush (George Bush’s younger brother) and Lewis Libby (Cheney’s chief of staff). The document, entitled Rebuilding America’s Defenses, was written in September 2000 by the neoconservative think tank, Project for the New American Century (PNAC).9/11, the Afghanistan war, the Iraq War, all of these random events happening in a continuous stream benefiting a select few within government and big corporations is by no means a coincidence. Within the PNAC documents it hinted that the Iraq war was well on its ways and that the Bush Administration planned on taking control of the Gulf region regardless if Saddam was in power. It quotes “while the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein.”

In simple terms, the need for a required American force presence in the Gulf goes beyond the regime of Saddam Hussein; us being there is far more important than regime change yet they will go hand in hand.PNAC is the American plan for global domination, all through the document it highlights North Korea, Syria, Iran, as dangerous regimes, and goes on to say they’re existence justifies the creation of a “worldwide command and control system”.It also includes China for “regime change”, stating “it is time to increase the presence of American forces in SE Asia”. The direction of where America is heading is absolutely ridiculous. Now before you start labeling supporters of these facts Conspiracy theorist or conspiratorial advocates, you really should think about how the PNAC documents explains what happen before, during, and after 9/11; the catalogue of evidence falls into place when set against the PNAC blueprint.There were countless warnings of these attacks forth coming and all the Bush Administration could do after was deny receiving any at all; criminal negligence. They received so many warnings and knew so much about the attack, and aided the terrorist in so many ways, lets just quote the former US federal crimes prosecutor, John Loftus, “The information provided by European intelligence services prior to 9/11 was so extensive that it is no longer possible for either the CIA or FBI to assert a defense of incompetence” You see, the real goal of 9/11 was never to catch Bin Ladin or liberate the Iraqi people from Saddam’s rule; the War of Terror is simply being used as a smokescreen cover for achieving US strategic geopolitical objectives.The Bush Administration was so intent on accomplishing these objectives to where it had intelligence cherry picked in order build a false basis for war. Specifically, Donald Rumsfield was so determined to obtain a rationale for an attack on Iraq that on 10 separate occasions he asked the CIA to find evidence linking Iraq to 9/11; the CIA repeatedly came back empty-handed (Time Magazine, May 13 2002). American investigative journalist Seymour Hurst states “Even before 9/11 Dick Cheney was insistence that the U.S must invade Iraq, and begin changing the world.” The only thing stopping Dick Chaney’s political desire of War in Iraq from coming to pass was a pretext; a way to get in. But Cheney’s dream was fulfilled with the attacks of 9/11. After 9/11 Dick Chaney then began to sell the American people a war, whether real or manufactured.Dick Chaney even visited the CIA headquarters, on 8 separate occasions, wanting to see more “forward leaning intelligence” on Iraq. Next is where things get just downright underhanded and dirty. The Pentagon then established a secretive group to work closely with the Vice President on intelligence matters; the group was known as the O.S.P, the Office of Special Plans. Greg Fieldman an intelligence specialist with the State Department is quoted stating “ They’re starting point was not to figure out what was going on, but lets see what kind of information we can come up with to justify the policy line we wish to pursue. Cheney was the driving force behind an orchestrated presentation to the American public of a different version of reality than, at least, the reality we saw.”In the intelligence community that’s called “Cherry Picking”; selecting individual morsels of information that support a certain view, and Stove Piping sending them without analyst right to the White House to be inserted into the president’s script. This is nothing more but conscious manipulation of intelligence far from an oversight. Another person who helped Cheney sell the war was “Ahmed Chalabi” an ex Iraqi patriot.

Chalabi’s organization was paid over 300,000 dollars a month to provide intelligence to the Office of Special Plans. In the end Vice President got his money’s worth. Chalabi, a convicted bank swindler who hadn’t lived in Iraq since he was 13, hoped to become the new Iraqi president once Saddam was captured; his O.S.P reports were routinely optimistic, stating that the Iraqis will greet American Troops as liberators. All of the deceitful tactics used against the American People by this administration can be viewed as treasonous, yet most stand by with they’re shameful apathy as America heads in the direction which is incrementally transforming this country into a imperial fascist state, when all political decisions are made solely to benefit major corporations.As an American, you must really look at all of these bizarre coincidences and inconsistencies and start to connect the dots at certain point. And to some people it’s a scary thing that they’re own government would manufacture a war and even commit an attack against them. Hard as it is to believe, all one has to do is look at who has the motive. Al-Quadia gains nothing from a 1000 or so Americans dying; they will be happy they killed a bunch of us, but in the end, what besides an emotion will they gain? Nothing. It would take centuries for any terrorist group to topple the U.S just by killing off its citizens in long drawn out coordinated attacks; it just cant be done, our founding fathers even admitted that, if this nation ever shall fall it will never be from an outside threat but it shall be destroyed from the inside. Disturbing enough, our government has a blueprint of objectives they need to accomplish and have no way of accomplishing them unless some sort of attack occurs which allows them to push the go button on all of they’re objectives; 9/11 provided that.It’s not far from the truth to state that the U.S government has made no “serious” attempt to catch Osama Bin Ladin, because, they haven’t! In late September and as early as Oct 2001, the leaders of Pakistan’s two Islamist parties negotiated Bin Ladins extradition to Pakistan to stand trial for 9/11, but the U.S REJECTED HIM! A U.S official was reported saying “casting our objectives too narrowly risked a premature collapse of the international effort, if by some lucky chance Mr Bin Laden was captured.” Next, the U.S Joint Chief of Staff, General Myers even openly stated that “ the goal has never been to get Bin Laden”.(AP, April 5,2002) Even the Fbi agent Robert Wright told ABC News(December 19,2002) that the FBI headquarters wanted no arrest. And the smoking gun to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt Bin Ladin never was the goal, our own U.S president George W.Bush admitted it, saying “the most important thing is for us to find Osama Bin Ladin. It is our number one priority & and we will not rest until we find him.”-Sept 13, 2001. Then as Bin Ladin became the least talked about throughout the media he stated “I don’t know where he is. I have no idea and I really don’t care. It’s not that important. It’s not our priority.” –March 13, 2002.All of these statements and reports which are considered evidence come directly from sources in the public domain, and when compared to the idea of having a war on terrorism, it’s absolutely incompatible. It leaves me in handicapped disbelief that after 9/11 Osama Bin Ladin was being broadcasted as being the mastermind behind the attacks and that we will catch him and bring him to justice but when a foreign government offers to directly hand him over to you, you DENY HIM! Why!?

This definitely supports the fact that Bin Ladin never was our goal. He was nothing more but an asset; used as political tool throughout the media when they needed him. And he to this day, goes on not captured, unpursued for the attacks of Sept 11; maybe because he didn’t commit them? It’s just so hard for me to believe this government let alone this president wants to catch Bin Ladin when he has so many close ties to him business wise. On 9/11 Bush Sr was in Washington in a meeting with Osama Bin Ladin’s Brother “Shafig Bin Laden” with the Carlyle Group hosting a conference at a Washington hotel.I couldn’t begin to picture that meeting “Uh hey man, you know my son is about to accuse your brother of the biggest terrorist attack on America, I just want you to know there isn’t any hard feelings ok? And don’t mind that we’re putting him as number 1 on the most wanted list, or that 25 million dollar bounty on his head to kill him.” America seeing all of these events unfold in front of my eyes and have the masses buy into it as if it were the Gospel Truth brings a tear to my eye. Sometimes it even makes me ashamed to be American the way the people in this country carry on in ignorance.And to touch upon another subject, among the most disgraceful, it has to be debunkers. Debunker are pathetic in they’re attempts to preserve the lies as truth in the official version of 9/11. They go to extreme lengths to accomplish this, from witness hearing explosions in the towers as being computers exploding or steel buckling so much that it just so happens to explode out of a wall and blow a bunch of people’s faces off. Amongst the many things they try to “debunk” they fail to address none WTC issues such as the PNAC documents or the Muhammad Atta Money Trail which leads back to Pakistan’s ISI then to our own CIA. They turn a blind eye to those things and throughout all of the mountains of evidence which shows federal involvement, including whistleblowers, who openly admit our government had complicity in the attacks.I can only look on in utter disgust. A 28 year CIA Veteran and Political Advisor Ray Mcgovern, went public in saying “We have to be careful, if somebody does this kind of provocation, big violent explosions of some kind, we have to not take the word of the masters there in Washington that this was some terrorist event because it could well be a provocation allowing them, or seemingly to allow them to get what they want.” And this is exactly the case if you investigate. If you’re going to ignore all of this evidence, why you don’t just give an applause once the Constitution is suspended after the next terrorist attack.The FBI, illegally, continues to refuse the release of their agent Robert Wright’s 500-page manuscript Fatal Betrayals of the Intelligence Mission, and still has refused to turn the manuscript over to Senator Shelby, vice-chairman of the joint intelligence committee charged with investigating America’s 9/11 intelligence failures. And the US government, caught red handed in the cookie jar, still refuses to declassify 28 secret pages of a recent report on 9/11. The only thing you can ask is WHY? If there is a gun behind a door on a table with your finger prints on it and a tape showing you committed a crime and authorities asked you to open to that door, would you open it????? No you wouldn’t, you would continue to want to keep that door LOCKED. And that exactly what the government is doing, protecting itself from incrimination.In all the paragraphs of things I’ve discussed I will leave you all with a profound quote from a truly patriotic journalist

“It is not the democrats who inaction in the face of the enemy you fear sir, it is your own, before 9/11 and you alone know this perhaps afterwards. Mr President, these new lies go to the heart of what it is you truly wish to preserve, it is not our freedom nor our country; your actions against the constitution give irrefutable proof of that. You want to preserve one political party’s power, and obviously you will sell this country out to do it. These are lies about the democrats pile the top, lies about Iraq, pile the top, lies about your preparations for Al Quiada. To you perhaps they feel like the weight of a million centuries, as crushing as immovable, but they are not. If you add more lies to them you cannot free yourself and us from them. But if you stop, if you stop fabricating quotes and stop building strawmen and stop inspiring those around you to do the same, you may yet liberate yourself and this nation. Please Sir, do not throw this countries principles away because your lies have made it such that you can no longer differentiate between the terrorist and the critics.” –Keith Olberman

Shit Thats Pissing Me Off Today 06/28/2014

1. I was in a mall, probably about 1 in the afternoon on my lunch break from WORK, and passed by this aboriginal woman sitting at a table. The first thing that struck me was the intense smell of whisky and smoke. She was playing some nerdy game on a nice Ipad, and had headphones on plugged into an Ipod Touch, until her phone vibrated and she answered a text on her Blackberry.

I was overcome with the urge to wish her a hearty ‘You’re welcome!’

Because I paid for that stuff. The gadgets and the booze and the smokes. You and I did. With taxes from going to our JOBS.

2. There is absolutely no way that malnourished slaves, in hot desert conditions hauled around blocks weighing several tons when building the pyramids. Inclined plane my ass. They were built by fucking aliens.

3. Is anyone else curious about how a dude, who worked as a salesperson for a company that sold poison gas to the Nazis, ever reached a position of worldwide authority? The Catholic Church seemed to like him. They made John Paul II pope!!

4. I’m tired of hearing how feminazis hate big, beautiful breast implants. There are documented cases of women’s lives being saved from potentially fatal gunshot wounds due to the size and density of her implants. So ladies, when we suggest bigger boobs, it’s only because we want you to be safe. And remember. The bigger they are the safer you’ll be!!

5. Why is it when one of my kids says something bad or inappropriate people always look at me like it’s my fault???? They have a mom too!!!!

15 Oddities Of McCartney, Bob Dylan & The Stones

I’m not sure where this essay came from but a fellow conspiranoid emailed this to me, and was just odd and weird enough for me to share here.


By 1966, The Beatles had achieved an incredible amount of success. The group was selling records by the millions. Young woman and men all over the world were going crazy for The Beatles. The band soon became the target of some bizarre accusations surrounding serious topics, including religion. On August 28, 1966, The Beatles gave their last taped press conference in the United States. During the fifteen minute session, the band received some weird questions, including, “Mr. Lennon and McCartney, Time Magazine has said your song Day Tripper is about a prostitute and Norwegian Wood is about a lesbian?” “Have you ever trained or used Beatles doubles?” “Mr. Lennon, is it true that you are going to give up music for a career in the field of comparative religion?” Lennon responds, “Ha, a little joke is going around.” In an August 19, 1966, interview, an important question was asked to The Beatles. “American people keep asking you guys about Vietnam. Does this seem useful? Why should they ask you about it, you’re successful entertainers?” Lennon responds, “Because Americans always ask showbiz people what they think, and so do the British.” In the 21st century, celebrity opinions hold influence on the media. The persona of a successful musician or actor is extremely powerful. Just imagine if you were able to capture that celebrity and use it for your own agenda. It is hard to comprehend the idea that Paul McCartney, Bob Dylan or Brian Jones were killed and replaced by a look-alike in the 1960s. We love these men, and that is why we research these accusations. It is fun to hear what people are saying.

Paul is Dead
In the fall of 1969, shortly after the release of The Beatles Abbey Road album, a rumor swept America concerning the death of Paul McCartney. People began to study the cover of Abby Road and wonder why McCartney is barefoot in the picture and out-of-step with the other Beatles. The evidence and suggestions regarding McCartney’s death quickly spread around the world. People began to phone in claims that The Beatles were using extensive hidden messages and backmasking in their records. The Paul is dead rumor popularized the use of backmasking in music. Let’s examine some of the most notorious claims. During 1969, the song Revolution 9 was played backward on numerous American radio stations. In the tune, the words “turn me on, dead man” can be recognized. In the Beatles single I’m So Tired, a sequence of gibberish can be heard, when played in reverse, the phrase “Paul is dead man, miss him, miss him” can be made out. In Strawberry Fields Forever, some believe John can be heard saying “I buried Paul” in a slow deep voice over the final refrain. People have pointed to the continued reference of the walrus in The Beatles music. In the song Glass Onion, John Lennon can be heard saying “Paul was the walrus.” This has been described as a reference to Paul’s disfigured corpse. To add fuel to the fire, The Beatles rarely commented on the Paul is dead rumor. After August of 1966, the band stopped making live performances. During this time in history, the group’s music changed. The Beatles wrote lyrics about death and suicide, and used dark imagery in their songs. The band’s singles were far from the fun loving collaborations that populated the radio during the early 1960s. By the end of the decade, the long time friendship between Paul McCartney and John Lennon deteriorated. The band separated in 1970, and Paul sued John, George and Ringo for breaking their contract with Apple Corp. The Beatles underwent an extensive change in their appearance from 1967-1970.

Sgt Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band
Sgt. Pepper’s is The Beatles 8th studio album, released on June 1, 1967. The cover image that was captured for the record has raised controversy. It was a difficult picture to take and it cost the band thousands of dollars. For the picture, 57 life-sized cardboard photographs of celebrities were constructed. The band also used nine waxwork models, a stone bust, a portable TV, four statuettes and a doll wearing a jumper with the words “Welcome the Rolling Stones.” The Sgt. Pepper’s cover appears to show a funeral service. All of the celebrities used in the picture have a common death experience. In 1967, when the photo was taken, most of the people had either died young or experienced a near-death accident. Many theories have been put forward to explain the inclusion of these specific people. In the case of Bob Dylan’s image, he experienced a bad 1966 motorcycle crash. The Sgt. Pepper’s album cover includes the image of Stuart Sutcliffe, who was The Beatles original bass player, who died in 1962. Some other noted appearances include occultist Aleister Crowley, Mae West, Jewish comedian Lenny Bruce, architect Simon Rodia, Robert Peel, Dylan Thomas, Dion, Marilyn Monroe, comedian Max Miller, Marlon Brando and many more. To the immediate left of the band is a younger cardboard copy of John, Paul, Ringo and George. The men appear to be sad and mourning. Like all Beatles album covers, it has been suggested that a large number of clues are visible that imply Paul McCartney’s death. The wreath of yellow flowers included on the cover appears to be in the shape of a left-handed bass guitar. A small white toy car is visible on the lap of the Shirley Temple doll. This is a bizarre feature that has been attributed to a possible car wreck. Shirley Temple is the only person, besides The Beatles, to appear in the image twice. The cover shows Paul McCartney wearing a hat with the letters O.P.P, which stands for Ontario Provincial Police. This falls in line with the reports that Paul McCartney was replaced with a man named William Sheppard, coming from the Canadian police department. The Sgt. Peppers album cover remains a great piece of photographic history.

60IF Document
A large collection of stories exist on the Internet regarding the death of Paul McCartney. The most prominent is the 60If documents. In late 1999, a man named Michael Abram broke into George Harrisons’ Friar Park home and stabbed him seven times. Harrison was nearly killed in the attack. As the story goes, George was targeted for murder because he collected evidence on the death of Paul McCartney and mailed it to some of his far eastern friends. In 2002, after George Harrison died from cancer, the 60IF document appeared online. The report is a reference to the 28IF license plate pictured on the Abby Road cover. It indicates that if Paul McCartney was alive, he would be 60-years-old in 2002. The tale begins with a prominent Jewish man named Brian Epstein. Epstein helped launch The Beatles career and he was their longtime manager. In 1967, Epstein’s duties in the group deteriorated, and he was pushed away from the band. He died on August 27, 1967, of a drug overdose. As the story goes, On September 11, 1966, Brian Epstein and Paul McCartney were traveling in a car when they were accosted by a group of men in black suits. Brian and Paul were kidnapped. Five days later, John, George and Ringo received a call to go identify the dead body of Paul McCartney. Paul was found at the foot of a hill, a short distance from a white Volkswagen. He was in a ghastly state. Paul had been dead for a long time. The left side of his face was torn to pieces. His right ear had been bitten away by animals. Paul’s body was half burned and his teeth were hanging from his lips. The 60IF report says that at the scene, John and George heard a man near the body say “Look …it seems like a walrus!” Brian Epstein’s dead body was discovered two days later. His car was pushed over a cliff and set on fire. Written on the side of the car was the word “Jude,” which is German for Jew. In September 1941, the Nazi regime ordered German Jews over the age of 6 to sew a yellow Star of David on their clothes with the word Jude (Jew) in bold. The 60IF report says that John, George and Ringo were determined to continue their music, so they allowed a secret group of cosmetic surgeons to replace Paul. However, in exchange for the help, the band was told to keep quiet. The penalty for refusing silence was death. The document says that a third Paul McCartney was used in the recording studio until a double was found. The candidate for Paul was William Sheppard from the Canadian Military Police. The report identifies a number of differences between Paul McCartney and William Sheppard. Paul was long-sighted, Bill is short-sighted. Paul’s hair naturally went from the left to right, while Bills from right to left. Paul had a round face and Bill has a longer face. Paul was left handed and Bill is right handed. After Paul’s death, the band began to refer to themselves as Beatles, instead of The Beatles. Bill had an older appearance, so they grew beards and mustaches. The paper continues to suggest that the KKK was responsible for the murders, and that Brian Epstein was the primary target. It says that Yoko Ono was a spy for the CIA, and that she was responsible for John Lennon’s death. The document claims that Paul McCartney died because he was unable to get medication for a disease he suffered from, apparently a form of Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Last Testament of George Harrison
Joel Gilbert is an American film director, writer and musician. He runs Highway 61 Entertainment, and has produced a number of films. Gilbert has developed four documentaries on the life of Bob Dylan and has released a collection of politically minded films about Israel and the United States. Later in this article, we will discuss the replacement of Bob Dylan. If we continue to follow this logic, Highway 61 Entertainment is putting out false information on the true life of Dylan. In 2010, Joel Gilbert released a documentary titled ‘Paul McCartney Really Is Dead: The Last Testament of George Harrison’. The information included in the film is similar to the 60IF document. However, many of the facts and circumstances of Paul’s death are different. It appears that we have several widely conflicting arguments. In the Highway 61 Entertainment documentary, Paul McCartney is killed on November 9, 1966. On the Sgt. Peppers album cover, a clue has been discovered on the drum set. It seems that the date 11-9 appears before the words “He Die.” In an interesting twist, it should be noted that British dates are written in a format of day-month-year instead of month-day-year. This suggests a date of September 11, which follows the 60IF document. According to the Last Testament of George Harrison, Highway 61 Entertainment received a of set of mini-cassettes, in 2005. The tapes described a plot to replace Paul McCartney with a man named William Campbell (not William Sheppard). Campbell was selected in a Paul McCartney look-alike contest (not from the Canadian military). Some aspects of Paul’s death are different in the documentary. Instead of a kidnapping, Paul is said to have died by way of a car accident. In the film, McCartney and Lennon have an argument in the recording studio, and Paul leaves in the middle of the night. He drives away in his white convertible and picks up a young hitchhiker named Rita. Rita becomes delirious with excitement and causes Paul to crash his car into a large truck. The description is similar to the death of Tara Browne, which will be discussed later. According to the account, McCartney was decapitated in the crash. John, George and Ringo were called to the scene. At that time, the group was approached by a MI5 agent named “Maxwell.” Maxwell made the comment about Paul looking like a walrus, and then he convinces the band to use a replacement. The documentary claims that “Rita” was actually Heather Mills. This is strange because Mills was born in 1968.

Phil Ackrill
Phil Ackrill is a man who was a member of an early 1960s group named Denny Laine and The Diplomats. Ackrill disappeared from the music scene in 1965, and has become connected with the Paul McCartney conspiracy. He played guitar and backup vocals for Denny Laine and The Diplomats. In 1964, Denny Laine left the band to join The Moody Blues. He sang the Moody Blues first big hit, Go Now. In August of 1966, Denny Laine quit The Moody Blues. He formed a group named The Electric String Band, which lasted only a couple years. In 1971, Denny Laine, Paul McCartney and Linda McCartney formed the band Wings. Denny Laine remained part of Wings for the group’s entire 10 year run. In this theory, the details surrounding Paul McCartney’s death are different. The story starts with Paul going missing in France. It is said that Brain Epstein traveled to France to find Paul. On their return flight, the men experienced a plane crash. Paul’s disfigured body was tossed from the plane. It was discovered on a beach near Outreau, North France. The conspiracy continues to describe a musician named Phil Ackrill, who was hired as Paul’s double, in 1965. Ackrill was a good lyricist and could play the piano and drums. He had a beautiful voice, but could not imitate Paul. For this reason, the band decided to use a voice imitator to complete Sgt. Peppers, the Magical Mystery Tour and some of the White album. In 1968, Phil Ackrill officially became Paul McCartney.

Tara Browne
The Honourable Tara Browne was a young London socialite, who was killed in an automobile accident on December 18, 1966. Browne was the son of Dominick Browne, 4th Baron Oranmore and a long lasting member of the House of Lords. Tara’s mother is Oonagh Guinness, who was the heiress to the Guinness fortune and the youngest of the three Golden Guinness Girls. Tara Browne was the heir to the Guinness dry stout fortune. The circumstances surrounding his death are connected to The Beatles and Brian Jones of The Rolling Stones. For starters, Tara Browne died during the same three-month time span that Paul McCartney is said to have passed. Browne was killed when his white Lotus Elan convertible crashed into a large truck near the junction of Redcliffe Square and Redcliffe Gardens, in Kensington, London. Tara Browne’s crash is extremely similar to some of the accounts of Paul McCartney’s fatal accident. A woman named Suki Potier was in the car with Tara Browne when he was killed. Suki was an English model. Following the crash, Potier started dating Brian Jones of The Rolling Stones, who was a great friend of Tara. Suki moved into Jones fifteenth century farmhouse in the last few months before his death. Tara Browne had a relationship with The Beatles. He was friends with both John Lennon and Paul McCartney. Tara Browne was with Paul McCartney when he crashed his moped in 1965, and received facial injuries. In 1967, The Beatles released the song A Day in the Life. The song has become famous for words describing a car accident. John Lennon has said the lyrics for A Day in the Life were written about the death of Tara Browne. “He blew his mind out in a car. He didn’t notice that the lights had changed. A crowd of people stood and stared. They’d seen his face before, nobody was really sure if he was from the House of Lords.” Seeing how Tara Browne was from the House of Lords, the lyrics are interesting. Some people have suggested that Paul McCartney was in the car with Tara Browne when he was killed. Web pages have been devoted to the comparison of Tara Browne and Paul McCartney images. Some have suggested that Tara replaced Paul McCartney, or that Brian Jones was in the crash. There are rumors of a gay relationship between Jones and Browne. Others have noted McCartney’s friendship with Tara Browne’s sister, Sabrina Guinness. In an interesting fact, Keith Richards named his second son Tara after Tara Browne. Sadly, Tara Richards was born prematurely and died soon after birth. In the photograph, Tara Browne can be seen on the right side of the image, looking a bit like Paul. Pictures of Dominick Browne are revealing. His eyes look like Paul McCartney in 2011.

Brian Jones
In April of 1962, Brian Jones formed The Rolling Stones. He was a talented musician and primarily played guitar and harmonica for the Stones. Brian Jones was raised in Cheltenham Spa, which is a borough in Gloucestershire, England, that has a reputation for being wealthy. His father was an aeronautical engineer. During his youth, Brian excelled in academics and sport, particularly swimming, even though he suffered from asthma. In the early years of The Rolling Stones, Brian Jones was the band’s leader. Along with Keith Richards, he was the force behind the group’s guitar work. Everything changed for Brian Jones in 1966. He began to distance himself from The Rolling Stones. Jones became a multi-instrumentalist, rather than a guitarist. One of the greatest guitar players of the 1960s stopped performing, and his natural progression of the instrument stopped. Brian Jones began to drink and he used a cocktail of drugs. His skin became pallid and blotchy and he put on weight. Jones became unrecognizable to his friends. In separate accounts, he beat up his girlfriend and pulled a knife on Mick Jagger. Brian threatened suicide and was extremely paranoid during this time of his life. In the summer of 1969, Jones attendance at The Rolling Stones recording sessions became more erratic. In June, he was kicked out of the band. On July 3, 1969, Brian Jones was killed when he drowned in his swimming pool. Jones death was ruled “death by misadventure,” caused by excessive use of drugs and alcohol. Since that day, a large amount of information has been presented on the case. The majority of controversy is over a man named Frank Thorogood. Frank Thoragood was with Brian Jones on the night of his death. He was a construction worker who had been hired to renovate Brian’s Cotchford Farm estate. Frank Thorogood and Brian Jones had a bizarre relationship that was full of disagreement. In books written on the life of Brian, it is said that Thorogood was not just a builder, but had been asked to “keep an eye” on Jones by the Stones. On his death bed, Frank Thorogood allegedly confessed to the murder of Brian Jones. In an interesting twist, Brian Jones was living with Tara Browne in 1966. Tara was the London socialite who was killed in a car crash on December 18. According to Wikipedia, after the death of Tara, his girlfriend, English model Suki Potier, began to date Brian Jones. She is quoted, “He gave me a shoulder to cry on and he picked up the pieces and made me feel like a woman again.” However, unless Brian Jones had two girlfriends, he couldn’t have started dating Suki Potier until he broke up with Anita Pallenberg, in March of 1967. At the time of his death, Tara Browne was married with two children, but it has been speculated that he was dating Potier. Suki Potier died in a car accident on June 23, 1981. The connection between these individuals has caused widespread conspiracy rumors. At the front of the conspiracy is the idea that Brian Jones was killed in a car accident with Tara Browne and replaced, marking the beginning of his long decent.

Amanda Lear
Amanda Lear is a French singer, lyricist, composer, painter and television personality. She began her career as a fashion model in the mid-1960s, and was also the muse of Spanish surrealist painter Salvador Dalí. Lear was a multimillion dollar selling Disco Queen in the mid-1970s to the early 1980s. To date, Amanda Lear has sold over 25 million singles. Despite the fact that she appeared nude in a 1977 edition of Playboy magazine, Lear has been accused of being a transsexual or an intersexual. After her Playboy spread was released, Lear gave the quote “and they could see I am a woman like everybody else.” People have speculated about her height, which is (5ft 9.25 /176 cm), her masculine facial features and, most of all, her exceptionally low baritone-like vocal timbre. Amanda Lear is one of Europe’s leading gay icons. She has regularly performed at Gay Pride festivals held in France, Italy, Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Belgium, The Netherlands and Greece. The life of Amanda Lear is confusing and there is a lack of photographic evidence from her youth. Her Wikipedia page indicates that Amanda was born in either 1939 or 1946. Amanda Lear was part of the Swinging London lifestyle of the 1960s. She was friends with The Beatles, Twiggy, The Rolling Stones, Bowie and a large collection of rock stars. Lear became a “stalwart of London’s demimonde” and an exotic name on the nightclub circuit. She was romantically linked with Bowie, Brian Jones and Tara Browne. Amanda Lear is the basis for a large collection of gay rumors surrounding famous people, including Lennon, McCartney, Bowie, Jones, Tara Browne and Salvador Dali. Her connection with Brian Jones resulted in the ironic Rolling Stones track “Miss Amanda Jones,” included on the 1967 album, Between the Buttons. In 1979, Lear married French bisexual aristocrat Alain-Philippe Malagnac d’Argens de Villèle who, in fact, was the former lover turned adopted son of diplomat and controversial gay novelist Roger Peyrefitte. The life of Amanda Lear is interesting. She has been connected to a large group of gay men. Lear dated both Tara Browne and Brian Jones, who are highly featured in this article. The conspiracy theory revolves around the suggestion that Amanda Lear may be a famous man in disguise, possibly someone involved with the December 18, 1966, car accident. If you see Lear in her older photographs, she looks like a man. In many of her images, Amanda is hiding her neck, giving the visual impression of a fake head imposed on body.

Bob Dylan
Bob Dylan’s early work has a large amount of political, social and literary influences. Some of these songs include Blowin’ in the Wind, The Times They Are a-Changin’, Oxford Town, Masters of War and A Hard Rain´s Gonna Fall. In 1964, Bob Dylan’s music career changed. His stance on war and the civil rights movement was silent, even after Martin Luther King Jr. was quoted saying that protest songs were important in bringing unity to America. In Dylan’s career, he only wrote protest songs over a 20 month span, from January 1962 to November 1963. What happened to Bob Dylan in November of 1963? When accepting the “Tom Paine Award” from the National Emergency Civil Liberties Committee shortly after the assassination of John F. Kennedy, an intoxicated Dylan brashly questioned the role of the committee, characterized the members as old and balding, and claimed to see something of himself (and of every man) in Kennedy’s alleged assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald. In August of 1964, the album Another Side of Bob Dylan was released, which was far from his early work. Dylan moved from a leading contemporary songwriter of folk music to a folk-rock pop-music star. During this time, Bob Dylan’s physical appearance underwent a rapid change. His scruffy jeans and work shirts were replaced by a Carnaby Street wardrobe. Bob Dylan wore sunglasses day or night and pointy “Beatle boots.” Before 1964, Dylan didn’t wear sunglasses often. He also began to gain a reputation for anger. Dylan regularly argued with the media and gave bizarre statements in interviews. People began to label his personality fake and uncharacteristic. In November of 1965, Bob Dylan married a woman named Sara. Very little is known about Sara’s early life and her relationship with Dylan. Their marriage was kept a secret. Her influence on his life should be relevant, seeing how Dylan changed his musical mindset after meeting Sara. By 1963, Bob Dylan and Joan Baez became prominent members of the civil rights movement. In 1965, Dylan released a song titled Positively 4th Street. The lyrics of the classic single are angered. Bob sings about vengeance and paranoia. This information suggests that something might have happened to Bob Dylan at the end of 1964. In the Beatles song Dig It, which we will examine later in this list, John Lennon sings “Like a Rolling Stone, A like a Rolling Stone.” In the context of this article, it may suggest that Bob Dylan was replaced by a look-alike on two separate occasions during the 1960s, once at the end of 1963 and again after his motorcycle crash of 1966.

Dylan’s Motorcycle Crash
On July 29, 1966, Bob Dylan crashed his motorcycle while riding near his home in Woodstock, New York. Even today, the details surrounding the accident are unclear. In fact, many important facts around the life of Bob Dylan are closely guarded. The accident has not been treated like a defining moment in Bob’s life. However, his musical stance and performance career was altered after the event. In 1965 and 1966, Bob Dylan was on fire. He wasn’t merely burning his candle at both ends. He was using a blowtorch. Dylan’s productivity was remarkable and he made three of his best albums. They were Bringing It All Back Home, Highway 61 Revisited and the double album Blonde on Blonde. The music was made within a 14-month span, which was likely fueled by methamphetamine. In 1966, Bob Dylan was extremely thin and had the look of a speed addict. In June 1966, Bob had returned from a nine-month world tour, which was especially grueling because he received hostility over his new sound. During the tour, Dylan plugged his guitar in and added an electrified backup band. Following Bob’s motorcycle accident, he disappeared for six weeks and canceled a scheduled 64-date American tour. A number of different accounts of the crash have been given by Bob Dylan and his friends. This has caused people to become suspicious of the incident. About the accident, Bob Dylan said that he broke several vertebrae in his neck. However, no ambulance was called and Dylan was not hospitalized.Bob’s biographers have written that the crash offered Dylan the much-needed chance to escape from the pressures of life. Others have suggested that Bob entered a drug rehabilitation clinic and that the motorcycle accident was a cover. In the wake of his crash, Bob Dylan withdrew from the public and, apart from a few select appearances, did not tour again for eight years. The amount of Bob Dylan pictures available from 1966 is immense. In 1967, his photographs resemble an entirely different individual. This has raised the conspiracy that Bob Dylan was killed in a 1966 motorcycle crash and replaced with a look-alike, possibly the second such occurrence for Dylan. In the back of your mind, you could be wondering how Bob Dylan, the greatest poet, lyricist and protest writer of the early 1960s, sat by quietly watching as Vietnam and the Civil Rights Movement of the late 1960s exploded. Then you examine the two photographs provided.

Behind Blue Eyes

“Nobody knows what it’s like to be the sad man, to be the bad man, behind blue eyes. Nobody knows what it’s like to be hated, to be faded, to telling only lies.” The photographic comparison of Bob Dylan from the 1960s shows some bizarre characteristics. The most unexplained is his blue eyes. Before 1964, Bob Dylan did not wear sunglasses in any pictures. His hair was long, but styled much differently on the top of his head. Many pictures exist of a young Bob Dylan, but 95% of them were taken with black and white film, so it can be difficult to determine his eye color. A set of pictures that were captured during Bob’s 1962 debut album cover shoot clearly show him with brown eyes. In 1965 and 1966, hundreds of photographs were taken of Bob Dylan. He is wearing sunglasses in almost every image.From 1964-1966, Bob Dylan can be seen with blue eyes in a number of photographs. He is also extremely thin. In 1967, the available images of Bob Dylan are gone. By 1968, some shots of Dylan exist, but he looks quite a bit different. For the most part, during this time of his life, Bob Dylan doesn’t wear glasses, but his brown eyes are back. Since the early 1970s, Bob Dylan has been photographed with blue eyes. It is a strange phenomenon that is not explained. Pete Townshend recalls. “In 1969, we (The Who) were set to play our new rock opera Tommy to the press at Ronnie Scott’s Jazz Club. It was our first live performance before the critics. As I crossed Dean Street I imagined I heard a voice shouting Judas. Did I fancy myself to be Bob Dylan?”


Mr. Jones

Mr. Jones is a man that has been included in the lyrics of many famous songs. He is a mysterious individual that longs to be in the spotlight. Mr. Jones is a plastic surgeon and talented doctor. He doesn’t quite know what is happening, but is pressured to complete his work in silence. Mr. Jones is a lonely man who will last forever. The persona of Mr. Jones was created in the 1965 song Ballad of a Thin Man, which was written and recorded by Bob Dylan. In the lyrics, Dylan sings about Mr. Jones who walks into a room of intentionally bizarre circus freaks and doesn’t “know what’s happening,” but realizes that something is terribly wrong. Following the release of the single, Bob Dylan was asked about the identity of Mr. Jones. He replied that “Mr. Jones is a pinboy. He also wears suspenders. He’s a real person. You know him, but not by that name. I saw him come into the room one night and he looked like a camel. He proceeded to put his eyes in his pocket. I asked this guy who he was and he said, “That’s Mr. Jones.” Then I asked this cat, “Doesn’t he do anything but put his eyes in his pocket?” And he told me, “He puts his nose on the ground.” It has been speculated that Mr. Jones is Jeffrey Owen Jones, who was an intern for Time magazine. Jeffrey Jones interviewed Bob Dylan in 1965. Mr. Jones makes another appearance in the song Yer Blues, which was written by John Lennon and released on The Beatles white album. The lyrics of Yer Blues include a number of references to Bob Dylan’s Ballad of a Thin Man. In the original demo of Yer Blues, John Lennon sings I feel so insecure, just like Dylan’s Mr. Jones, as opposed to the word suicidal, which was later added to the song. Yer Blues was a special song for John Lennon. He chose the single for use in The Rolling Stones Rock and Roll Circus, which was a concert performed on December 11, 1968. During the show, the song was performed by the supergroup dubbed the The Dirty Mac, which consisted of Lennon, Eric Clapton on lead guitar, Keith Richards on bass, and Mitch Mitchell on drums. The character of Mr. Jones made a comeback in 1993, with a hit song by the Counting Crows. The official person referenced in the Counting Crow’s single is not clear, but the inclusion of the lyrics “I wanna be Bob Dylan and Mr. Jones wishes he was someone just a little more funky” appears to be a play on Dylan’s work. In 1997, the band Aqua released a song titled Dr. Jones.

Henry M. Truby

Voiceprint identification is a process that involves the combination of both aural (listening) and spectrographic (instrumental) comparisons of the human voice. The modern-day forensic utilization of the technique started in the late 1960s. Since that time, voice identification has been used in a large number of criminal cases around the world. In 1969, at the height of the Paul is dead coverage, a man named Henry M. Truby stirred up some international media controversy. Truby was the Director of Language and Linguistics Research at the University of Miami. In 1969, he examined several audio recordings of The Beatles to see if the group’s “sonic fingerprints” matched. Henry Truby’s findings revealed a spectrograph of what he claimed is three separate Pauls. Truby stated that his experiments were conducted with a sound spectrograph machine that indicated that there were six different voices on the Beatles records. Three people were clearly identified as John Lennon, George Harrison and Ringo Starr. The other three musicians sounded “roughly” like the same person, however, the spectrograph, which makes a clear “fingerprint,” showed a different authorship. In the late 1960s, the news prompted Apple Corp to issue a brief statement from Paul, “I am alive and well and unconcerned about the rumors of my death. But if I were dead, I would be the last to know.” Research into the issue has been conducted by various independent technicians. Let’s examine some claims.The last full song performed by James Paul McCartney was ‘She’s Leaving Home’ on the Sgt. Peppers album. However, his voice is evident in many songs after 1966. It is said that James Paul McCartney left behind an unfinished version of Penny Lane, so he is heard only in the main chorus. The first song that was performed strictly by today’s Paul McCartney was Hello, Goodbye. Voice analysis has suggested that James Paul McCartney is responsible for the song Her Majesty, which appears at the end of The Beatles Abbey Road album. Her Majesty is a bizarre tune. It is only 22 seconds long and has been attributed to both Lennon/McCartney. No trusted scientific journal has yet to officially examine or publish voiceprint recordings of Paul McCartney.

Dig It

In 1970, The Beatles released a song titled Dig It. The song is one of the few Beatles tunes to be credited to all the band members. Several versions of Dig It were recorded during the Get Back/Let It Be jam sessions of late January 1969. A 51-second version of the single was chosen for the Let It Be album. The song includes a bizarre sequence of celebrity references that have been the target of controversy. In the released version, Lennon sings “Like a rolling stone. A like a rolling stone. Like the FBI and the CIA, and the BBC, BB King and Doris Day, Matt Busby.” At the end of the song Lennon can be heard saying “that was Can You Dig It by Georgie Wood, and now we’d like to do Hark the Angels Come.” The second sentence was cut out from the Let It Be film recording. Some people don’t realize that a longer version of Dig It was recorded, and that it is a bit more revealing. Towards the end of the tune Lennon begins to shout out a list of songs that The Beatles were currently working on and then he begins to speak various statements. He suggests that we should “dig” in their graves and “dig” for the truth. He mentions the year 1958. Is it possible that John Lennon was singing about a collection of celebrities that have received the same treatment as Paul McCartney? The person that immediately stands out is B.B. King. Similar to McCartney, a rumor has been spreading for a long time that B.B King was killed and replaced. In 1958, King’s tour bus collided with a gas truck while traveling on a bridge in Texas. The truck driver was killed in the accident and the bus was burned beyond recognition. Reports surfaced that B.B. King was killed in the crash, but it was revealed that he was not on the bus. On the weekend of the accident, King’s insurance company was in the process of dissolution and his insurance was terminated. B.B. King has performed over 15,000 concerts in his career and continues to entertain the masses. In the song Dig It, John’s reference to the Rolling Stones has been attributed to two possible individuals, Bob Dylan and Brian Jones. Doris Day is an American actress and singer. To date, she has starred in 39 films and recorded over 650 songs. As of 2009, Doris Day was the top-ranking female box office star of all time. The conspiracy theory claims that Doris Day died in 1958, after suffering from an unknown illness. In an interesting twist, the only son of Doris Day is a man named Terry Melcher, who was connected to Charles Manson and owned the house where Sharon Tate was murdered. Matt Busby was a Scottish football player and manager. He managed Manchester United between the years 1945 and 1969. In 1958, the Munich air disaster occurred, when a plane carrying the Manchester United football team crashed and 23 people died. Eight Manchester United players died in the crash. The theory states that Matt Busby was killed in the 1958 accident, and replaced with a look-alike. At the end of Dig It, Lennon makes a reference to Wee Georgie Wood, who was a British actor and comedian who appeared in films, plays and music hall revues. Wood, who was a midget, worked most his professional life in the disguise of a child, appearing in comic and sentimental sketches. Whatever the case, John Lennon certainly put together an interesting list of people for this song.

Gabriella Carlesi and Francesco Gavazzeni

Gabriella Carlesi is an Italian forensic pathologist who specializes in the identification of people through craniometry, which is the comparison of skull features. Carlesi is a forensic odontologist and an expert in the study of teeth. Francesco Gavazzeni is a specialist in computer analyses. In the past fifteen years, the pair have worked on a number of high profile identification cases. In 2008, Carlesi and Gavazzeni became interested in the Paul McCartney conspiracy theory. Originally, they were attempting to dismiss the claims. However, they soon discovered some bizarre facts. After images of Paul were analyzed from before and after 1966, the professionals were shocked to discover that the faces did not match. The findings were published in the July 15, 2009, issue of Wired Italia, the Italian edition of the US magazine Wired. When comparing photos of the human face, the pictures must be re-sized and scaled. In this case, the researchers chose the distance between the pupils for a scaling factor. After the pictures are scaled, they can be placed over each other and examined. The article suggests that the older photos of Paul do not match. It provides scientific evidence to support the accusations. The frontal curvature of the jaw in each Paul is different. The later Paul has a head that is more oblong and not as rounded. The article suggests that plastic surgery is highly visible in the older McCartney. Carlesi points out that the line separating Paul’s lips is much wider. The identifiable point where the nose detaches from the face is different and the pictures show some bizarre characteristics in the ears. The paper states that the teeth of each individual are different, and that there is evidence of alterations to the older Paul. During the research, Carlesi became amazed with the difference in the shape of the palate. The mandibular curve between the two sets of photos showed a discrepancy of over 6 percent, well beyond the threshold of error. Before 1966, each side of Paul’s jaw is composed of two curves. Since 1967, it appears to be a single curve. The researchers suggest that if Paul McCartney wants to put an end to the rumors, he can offer a DNA test. They discuss a case from the early 1970s in which McCartney had to give a DNA sample. The test was requested by a German woman named Bettina Krischbin.Bettina Krischbin claims that her 1962 birth certificate shows that Paul McCartney is her father. The DNA test that Paul was forced to submit indicates that he is not the father. Since the occurrence, Bettina has accused McCartney of sending a substitute for the test. She claims that the signature given by the donor is that of a right handed individual. In 2006, the German authorities opened a case into the claim. If Paul is proven to be the father of Bettina Krischbin, she could receive 10% of his estate upon death. By coincidence, on the same day that the article was released in Italy, July 15, 2009, Paul McCartney appeared on the David Letterman Show in New York City. McCartney gave an outdoor performance on top of the Ed Sullivan theatre. During the interview, Paul laughed with Letterman about the silly rumor that he had died in 1966.

The Denver Airport Creepiness

Here’s the back story: built in 1995, construction of the Denver International Airport was questionable considering that Denver already had a fully-functioning airport, and the new airport featured even less runways and no new technological advancements to justify its existence – the only advantage that the new airport had over the old one was the unnecessarily large amount of space it occupied.

Conspiracists believe that the large amount of unoccupied space that the airport is built upon is a cover-up for what lies beneath… namely, a huge underground military bunker, which would reportedly be used to house people of importance in the event of an attack. However, unlike many conspiracy theories, this one isn’t without its evidence – the airport is lined with strange, terrifying murals depicting mass genocide. Here’s just a couple of them:



Global Hiroshima

Not exactly the kind of paintings you’d want to see before going on holiday, are they?

Denver Airport went roughly 3.1billion dollars over budget, except no one quite knows who paid for it. A stone in the terminal states that it was funded by ‘The New World Airport Commission’, but therein lies another mystery – the New World Airport Commission doesn’t actually exist.

Conspiracists believe that the New World Airport Commission is a nod to the New World Order (we’ll get to them later), and that the highly advanced bunker built underneath the airport will house VIP’s when the New World Order eventually begins its genocide of the human race (again, later). Others believe that the airport will be used as a modern concentration camp, with its Nazi-esque imagery (from an aerial view even the runways are shaped to look like a swastika) and ability to house thousands of people cited as evidence for this belief. Whatever the reasoning behind its strange aesthetics, no airport should greet its visitors with a giant statue of a demonic war-horse the way that Denver does.